Posts Tagged ‘Department of Conservation’

Tramping Nappies

Monday, November 16th, 2009

A very realistic Department of Conservation signs are warning people walking the Routeburn track to wear nappies.

New Zealand DOC sign

The bogus sign that has all the colour and logo of a real DOC sign, asks track uses to

“Please do not defecate in our National Parks. Heavy duty tramping nappies are available from all DOC visitor centres free of charge, and DOC hut wardens carry an emergency supply. Toilets in conservation areas are strictly for urination only.”

Understandingly no one has claimed responsibility for the fake signs but the message appears to be clearly from someone who believe that commercialisation of New Zealand’s walks have led to an increase in human waste pollution.

Routeburn Track not a walk in the Park

Tuesday, August 4th, 2009

The official coroner’s report into the death last year of an inexperienced tramper has recommended New Zealand’s Department of Conservation review the branding of its “Great Walks” tramping tracks.

The 35 year old Israeli veered of the South Islands Routeburn Track onto an unformed Department of Conservation emergency avalanche route. She subsequently fell on slippery boulders, breaking her neck.

The coroner has raised with the department whether the expression “Great Walk” adequately describe the tramping trip through difficult and potentially dangerous, rugged back-country terrain, with often unpredictable weather conditions. Coroner David Crerar was concerned that “inexperienced tourists – especially who spoke English as a second language – saw “walk” and discounted the seriousness of the situation”

Routeburn Track Map

Trampers Waste Police Resources

Wednesday, January 14th, 2009

Trampers and hikes who fill in intention forms at the Department of Conservation (DOC) offices are not returning the forms stubs. Trampers take off a stub from the form that is meant to be returned to the departments offices to confirm that trampers have returned safely.

Intention forms are a useful safety system that informs DOC of the intended track location to be walked and a panic date if trampers do not return. Understandably if trampers do not inform DOC that they have returned safely then a full scale search and rescue can result .

The problem is so wide spread that police are spending many man hours checking accommodation providers, car rental firms and airports in efforts to trace people and double check they had returned safely and were not overdue.

Fox Glacier off track kills two

Friday, January 9th, 2009

Two Australian visitors have been killed by tonnes of falling ice at the terminal face of Fox glacier located on the West Coast of the South Island, New Zealand. The two brothers aged 22 and 24 had stepped over the barrier to get closer to the glacier. It is believed that they were photographing at the time the huge slabs of ice crushed them.

Fox Glacier Sign

Ice is constantly falling from the face of the glacier terminal into the river below but on this occasions large slabs the size of vehicles fall onto the unsuspecting men.

Local media are portraying the men as foolish for ignoring warning signs to stay on the designated track. As the glacier has receded in recent years, the track to view the glacier finishes at least five hundreds metres short of the terminus. Most visitors to the glacier step over the low fence and continue further for a closer look. This can be clearly seen by the well worn path on the other side of the official fence.

I believe that the actions of the two unfortunate Australians were indicative of most visitors and the real issue lies with The Department of Conservations inadequate viewing track. As one of New Zealands greatest scenic attractions, the track to Fox Glacier should be upgraded and moved forward to a point that gives visitors the vistas that are commonly advertised and which sight seers have come to expect. If the track ended at a safe distance but still within the commonly publicised view, the need to leave the track would not exist.

It is clear that the two visitors were dangerously close but the official excuse that there are ample warning signs does not absolve the Department of shouldering some of the responsibility. The present track terminates at a point that it almost invites visitors to proceed uncontrolled.